Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating condition, characterised by pain in a limb, in association with sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor, motor and dystrophic changes. It commonly arises after an injury to that limb. Pain is typically the leading symptom of CRPS but is often associated with limb dysfunction and psychological distress. Patients frequently report neglect-like symptoms or a feeling that the limb is ‘alien’.

CRPS can be divided into two types based on the absence (type 1, much more common) or presence (type 2) of a lesion to a major nerve. The subtype of CRPS has no consequences for the general approach to management, but the cause of nerve damage in CRPS 2 should always be clarified – urgently in acute cases.

Nomenclature

Historically, among the many names that CRPS has been called, RSD and causalgia are the best known and still are commonly used. The existence of this confusing taxonomy for CRPS stems, in part, from the many nonstandardized, idiosyncratic, diagnostic schemes used throughout the past century and a half . In 1851, Claude Bernard (1813–1878) was the first to mention a pain syndrome that was linked to sympathetic nervous system dysfunction. Later, a student of Bernard, Silas Weir-Mitchell (1829–1914), employed the term “causalgia” to describe the pain he diagnosed in post-bellum union veterans. (Greek: kausos = heat, algos = pain). Evans first coined the term “reflex sympathetic dystrophy”. Although “RSD” became the most common name to describe this medical condition in the latter 20th century, this name is

Evans first coined the term “reflex sympathetic dystrophy”. Although “RSD” became the most common name to describe this medical condition in the latter 20th century, this name is problematic for several reasons: if a true “reflex” is indeed involved, it is complicated/multisynaptic and not fully characterized; it has since been shown that the assumed “sympathetic”/autonomic changes may not be a constant or causative pain component and furthermore may not be physiologically involved throughout the entire course of the condition in every patient, and actual “dystrophy” is present in perhaps only 15% of cases. The historical lack of agreement regarding standardized nosology and diagnostic criteria for CRPS/RSD has hindered medical and scientific progress in many ways, including lack of comparative studies of treatment of the disorder, and thus has delayed progress in identifying optimal treatments and treatment sequences for its sufferers.

Procedures we offer for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)

Diagnostic criteria proposed by the international consensus conference, Budapest, 2004

The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) has approved the Budapest criteria as the current diagnostic criteria for CRPS. The Budapest criteria now supersede the diagnostic criteria published by the IASP in 1994. It appears that the Budapest criteria are more restrictive than the Orlando criteria.

  1. Continuing pain, which is disproportionate to any inciting event
  2. Must report at least one symptom in three of the four following categories
  • Sensory: Reports of hyperalgesia and/or allodynia
  • Vasomotor: Reports of temperature asymmetry and/or skin color changes and/or skin color asymmetry
  • Sudomotor/Edema: Reports of edema and/or sweating changes and/or sweating asymmetry
  • Motor/Trophic: Reports of decreased range of motion and/or motor dysfunction (weakness, tremor, dystonia) and/or trophic changes (hair, nail, skin)

3.  Must display at least one sign* at time of evaluation in two or more of the following categories

  • Sensory: Evidence of hyperalgesia (to pinprick) and/or allodynia (to light touch and/or deep somatic pressure and/or joint movement)
  • Vasomotor: Evidence of temperature asymmetry and/or skin color changes and/or asymmetry
  • Sudomotor/Edema: Evidence of edema and/or sweating changes and/or sweating asymmetry
  • Motor/Trophic: Evidence of decreased range of motion and/or motor dysfunction (weakness, tremor, dystonia) and/or trophic changes (hair, nail, skin)

4. There is no other diagnosis that better explains the signs and symptoms

Assessment of CRPS severity

Mild CRPS signs and symptoms

To categorise CRPS as ‘mild’, a patient would have few signs of significant pain-related disability or distress, and either conventional or neuropathic drugs would manage pain intensity adequately. Patients who exhibit high levels of pain, disability or distress should be referred to a multidisciplinary pain. Treatment should be initiated as early as possible. If at any stage during treatment the therapist is unsure whether to continue with single-handed therapy or to refer for multidisciplinary rehabilitation, further advice should be sought from an experienced colleague.

Moderate to severe presentation/poor treatment response

If one or more of the following features that indicate moderate or severe disease and/or poor recovery are present, an early referral to a multidisciplinary pain clinic or specialist unit is recommended:

  • presentation with moderate to severe signs and symptoms (except if of very recent onset after trauma and quickly resolving)
  • presence of dystonia
  • no positive treatment response within four weeks
  • condition deteriorates or improvements are not sustained despite ongoing treatment.

In addition to providing CRPS-specific rehabilitation techniques, specialist units may treat patients with advanced drug and interventional techniques, including spinal cord stimulation. Some regions have direct therapy referral agreements with the local multidisciplinary pain clinic.

Yellow Flags

Recognition of psychosocial risk factors, referred to as yellow flags can support therapists in understanding contributing causes for suboptimal treatment response. The presence of these factors has been used in other pain conditions to predict chronicity. Yellow flags may be present at initial assessment or may develop and become apparent during treatment. Recognition of these flags may guide referral to multidisciplinary pain clinics and psychology-led PMPs.

Yellow flags include:

(Adapted from Main and Williams 2002)

  • iatrogenic factors, ie previous negative experiences with health professionals
  • poor coping strategies, eg ongoing ‘guarding’ of the limb despite education
  • involved in litigation, which is affecting willingness to progress with treatment (note that this is not the case for all patients involved in litigation)
  • distress
  • anxiety/depression
  • lack of willingness to set goals
  • passive in treatment sessions
  • inappropriate beliefs despite education
  • negative family influences

Differential diagnosis

It is important to consider other possible pathologies (differential diagnoses) during diagnostic assessment:

  • infection (bone, soft tissue, joint or skin)
  • orthopaedic malfixation
  • joint instability
  • arthritis or arthrosis
  • bone or soft tissue injury (including stress fracture, instability or ligament damage)
  • compartment syndrome
  • neural injury (peripheral nerve damage, including compression or entrapment neuropathy, or central nervous system or spinal lesions)
  • thoracic outlet syndrome (due to nerve or vascular compression)
  • arterial insufficiency (usually after preceding trauma, atherosclerosis in the elderly or thrombangiitis obliterans (Burger’s disease))
  • Raynaud’s disease
  • lymphatic or venous obstruction
  • Gardner–Diamond syndrome
  • brachial neuritis or plexitis (Parsonage–Turner syndrome or neuralgic amyotrophy)
  • erythromelalgia (may include all limbs)
  • self-harm

Management of CRPS

  • Prompt diagnosis and early treatment are required to avoid secondary physical problems associated with disuse of the affected limb and the psychological consequences of living with undiagnosed chronic pain.
  • Early referral to physiotherapy and encouraging gentle movement as early as possible, may potentially prevent progression of symptoms.
  • Except in mild cases, patients with CRPS are generally best managed by specialist pain management or rehabilitation programmes.
  • An integrated interdisciplinary treatment approach is required, including the four ‘pillars of intervention’.

Four pillars of care in CRPS

The four ‘pillars’ of care (education, pain relief, physical rehabilitation and psychological intervention, which address these aims have equal importance. However, full recovery can be difficult to achieve in some, even with early appropriate treatment. Practitioners can support patients by providing a clear diagnosis, information and education about the disease, helping to set realistic goals and, where possible, involving the patient’s partner and/or other family members.

Education and information for the patient and family

  • Active engagement of the patient/family in goal setting, goal review
  • Control – the patient remains responsible for their own rate of progress
  • Understanding and insight: how emotional stress, muscle tension and de-conditioning can increase pain experience
  • Learning: self-management approach, including goal setting and pacing and the right balance between doing too much and too little
  • Empowering the family: encouraging individual to keep active and to do more for themselves

Medical management

  • Investigation and confirmation of diagnosis
  • Pharmacological intervention (in conjunction with pain team wherever appropriate) to provide a window of pain relief
  • Reassurance that physical and occupational therapy is safe and appropriate
  • Provide medical follow-up to prevent iatrogenic damage through inappropriate referral
  • Support any litigation/compensation claim to its resolution and conclusion

Psychosocial and behavioural management

  • Identify any psychological factors contributing to pain and disability
  • Treat anxiety and depression
  • Identify, explore and proactively address any internal factors (eg counter-productive behaviour patterns) or external influences (eg perverse incentives, family dynamics etc) which may perpetuate disability/dependency
  • Consider needs of family/carers – provide psychological intervention/counselling where appropriate
  • Provide a practical problem-solving, goal-orientated approach (involving both the patient and their family) to reduce barriers and promote healthy functioning

Physical management

  • Retrain normal body posture
  • Desensitisation – handling the affected part following by passive stretching and isometric exercise
  • Progression to active isotonic exercise and then strength training
  • General body re-conditioning – cardiovascular fitness
  • Encourage recreational physical exercise and functional goals
  • Techniques to address altered perception and awareness of the limb, eg mirror visual feedback training or graded motor imagery

Pharmacological management of CRPS

No drugs are licensed to treat CRPS in the UK.

Drugs with efficacy in neuropathic pain should be used according to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for neuropathic pain and the recommendations of the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP).

Pamidronate (single 60 mg intravenous dose) should be considered for suitable patients with CRPS less than 6 months in duration as a one-off treatment.

Intravenous regional sympathetic blocks (IVRSB) with guanethidine should not be used routinely in the treatment of CRPS, as four randomised controlled trials have not demonstrated any benefit.

Interdisciplinary Management of CRPS

A Dahlem type (think tank) conference was held in Malibu, California, in 1997 to generate consensus as to treatment guidelines for CRPS. All treatments were focused primarily on functional restoration; the use of drugs, blocks, and psychotherapy was reserved for patients failing to progress in the functional algorithm. Interdisciplinary pain management techniques emphasizing functional restoration are thought to be the most effective therapy perhaps by resetting altered central processing and/or normalizing the distal environment.The principle of functional restoration is based on a gradual and steady progression from activation of

The principle of functional restoration is based on a gradual and steady progression from activation of presensorimotor cortices (i.e., motor imagery and visual-tactile discrimination) to very gentle active movements such as progressing from active range of motion (ROM), to weight bearing such as carrying light bags with the upper extremity or putting partial weight on the lower extremity in gait training. This progresses to movements that involve more active load bearing such as the scrub and carry techniques of Carlson. Gradual desensitization to increasing sensory stimulus goes along with increased function. This could include such strategies as progressive stimulation with silk, progressing to other textures of cloth such as towel, or contrast baths that progressively broaden the temperature difference between the two baths. It is thought that perhaps this gradual increase in normalized sensation tends to reset the “altered central processing” in the nervous system. It is important to manage edema in order to optimize ROM and encourage general aerobic activity throughout.

Another basic principle of these functional restoration guidelines is that if patients do not progress through the steps in “a reasonable time,” then other interventions will be progressively added to give the patient greater comfort or confidence so that they may proceed to the next level. For instance, if the allodynic pain is too great, a sympathetic and/or somatic block may give the patient a comfort window of opportunity to begin to entertain more aggressive therapy, or if a patient has kinesiophobia, cognitive behavioral techniques could be undertaken to demonstrate to the patient that movement does not necessarily lead to negative consequences. Blocks, psychotherapy, and drugs should be used mainly in situations of failure to progress; however, if a patient presents with significant concomitant problems (e.g., depression), then certain drugs, blocks, or psychotherapies are recommended from the outset.

Summary

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating, painful condition in a limb associated with sensory, motor, autonomic, skin and bone abnormalities. Pain is typically the leading symptom but is often associated with limb dysfunction and psychological distress. Prompt diagnosis and early treatment are required to avoid secondary physical problems related to disuse of the affected limb and the psychological consequences of living with undiagnosed chronic pain.

Have a question? Or would like to book in with us?

Get in Touch

Common Conditions
that we Treat Everyday

View All Conditions

Latest from the Blog

Posted 14 Oct, 2017

When the Last Resort Fails: Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Las Vegas—Surgery is a last resort in seeking relief for chronic low back pain—the most common cause of disability—but unsuccessful surgery occurs often enough to warrant its own diagnostic code as failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). The condition was examined in a well-attended session at the recent PAINWeek 2017 ann...
Posted 14 Oct, 2017

FDA Asks, Gets Answers on Reducing Opioid Epidemic

The prevalence and consequences of opioid use disorder can be reduced without preventing patients with pain from receiving necessary opioid analgesics, according to a consensus report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine requested by the FDA. The report, issued July 13, distinguishes its f...
Posted 02 Oct, 2017

The chronic pain that won’t go away: CRPS

CRPS is a rare neurological condition that causes unending agony and misery. But now a special implant offers hope to sufferers. What’s it like to have a pain that just won’t go away? Complex regional pain syndrome, or CRPS, causes exactly that, and it’s as hard to diagnose as it is to understand. It can […]