Could This Back Pain Be Ankylosing Spondylitis? A Clinician’s Guide to the Work-Up
Pain Spa Clinical Update
Suspected Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Practical Work-Up, and Why MRI Now Comes First
Who to suspect, which tests to order, and when to refer
Dr Murli Krishna, Consultant in Pain Medicine, Pain Spa
Ankylosing spondylitis is easy to miss. It starts young, looks like ordinary back pain, and routine blood tests are often normal. This article sets out a practical work-up for the clinician who suspects it, including the recent move to MRI as the first imaging test.
Key points
- Think of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in anyone with back pain lasting 3 months or more that began before the age of 45.
- No single symptom, examination finding, blood test or scan makes the diagnosis. It rests on the overall pattern.
- A normal CRP does not exclude the condition. HLA-B27 supports the diagnosis but is not diagnostic.
- MRI of the sacroiliac joints is now recommended as the first imaging test, in place of X-ray (2025 EULAR imaging update, presented at ACR Convergence 2026).
- Refer to rheumatology early. Diagnosis is often delayed by years.
Why This Matters in a Pain Clinic
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the best-known form of axial spondyloarthritis, an inflammatory disease of the sacroiliac joints and spine. The term axSpA covers both patients with definite sacroiliitis on X-ray (radiographic axSpA, or AS) and those without (non-radiographic axSpA).
Patients with undiagnosed axSpA often reach a pain clinic labelled as chronic low back pain or sacroiliac joint pain. The pain clinician is therefore well placed to recognise the pattern and start the work-up.
“Some patients come to us after years of treatment aimed at a mechanical cause for their back or buttock pain. Before planning any intervention, I ask whether the pattern could be inflammatory, because that changes who should be leading the patient’s care.”
Dr Murli Krishna, Consultant in Pain Medicine, Pain Spa
Who to Evaluate
The entry point is chronic back pain (3 months or longer) that started before the age of 45. Suspicion rises when this is accompanied by one or more spondyloarthritis (SpA) features.
| Group | SpA features to look for |
|---|---|
| Back and buttock | Inflammatory back pain; alternating buttock pain |
| Peripheral | Asymmetric arthritis; heel pain (enthesitis); dactylitis |
| Outside the joints | Anterior uveitis (iritis); psoriasis; inflammatory bowel disease |
| Family history | axSpA, reactive arthritis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease or anterior uveitis |
| Response and bloods | Good response to NSAIDs; raised CRP or ESR |
Inflammatory back pain is common in axSpA (reported in 63–92% of patients) but it is not required for the diagnosis.
Inflammatory Versus Mechanical Back Pain
| Feature | Inflammatory pattern | Mechanical pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Onset | Insidious, usually before 40 | Any age, often activity-related |
| Exercise | Improves | Worsens with activity, flexion, sitting or a prolonged position |
| Rest | No improvement | Relieved |
| Night | Night pain, often waking in the second half of the night | Less typical |
| Morning stiffness | Prolonged, more than 30 minutes | Brief or absent |
| Site | Alternating buttock or deep gluteal pain | Unilateral or localised; may radiate to buttock or posterior thigh, typically not past the knee |
| NSAIDs | Marked improvement | Variable |
Do not over-rely on the pattern. Inflammatory back pain criteria were developed mainly for classification. Reported sensitivity is about 74–81%, with specificity as low as 25–44%. Among individual items, morning stiffness of more than 30 minutes has been reported as the most specific and insidious onset as the most sensitive. Combinations of features carry more weight than any single one.
History and Examination
| Area | What to assess |
|---|---|
| Spinal mobility | Spinal tenderness; lumbar range of motion (Schober test); chest expansion, judged against age and sex |
| Posture | Occiput-to-wall distance and thoracic kyphosis (later findings) |
| Sacroiliac joints | Pain reproduced by provocation tests such as FABERE or Gaenslen |
| Peripheral | Peripheral joints; entheses (Achilles tendon, plantar fascia); digits for dactylitis |
| Skin and nails | Psoriasis |
| Eyes | A painful red eye with photophobia needs urgent ophthalmology referral for slit-lamp examination to rule out acute anterior uveitis |
| Gut | Diarrhoea, blood in the stool, weight loss |
Spinal mobility manoeuvres have low specificity (36–45%). Normal movement does not exclude early disease, and restricted movement does not confirm it.
Blood Tests
| Test | What it tells you | Caution |
|---|---|---|
| HLA-B27 | Positive in 70–90% of patients with axSpA. Supports the diagnosis in the right clinical setting. | A positive result does not mean the patient has axSpA. Most carriers never develop it, so the result only carries weight when the clinical picture fits. Not a screening test. |
| CRP and ESR | Supportive when raised. | Raised in only about 40% of patients, so a normal result does not exclude disease. Also raised by obesity, infection and other inflammatory arthritis. |
| Baseline bloods | Full blood count, renal and metabolic profile, liver function. Help with the differential and prepare for NSAID or biologic therapy. | Rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP only if peripheral joint findings suggest rheumatoid arthritis. |
“A normal CRP is the result that most often gives false reassurance. If the history fits, normal bloods should not close the question.”
Dr Murli Krishna, Consultant in Pain Medicine, Pain Spa
Imaging: MRI Now Comes First
This is the area where practice is changing. Major reviews published up to 2025 recommended an X-ray of the pelvis or sacroiliac joints first, with MRI reserved for patients whose X-ray was normal or equivocal.
What has changed
The 2025 update of the EULAR imaging recommendations, presented at ACR Convergence 2026, makes MRI of the sacroiliac joints the first imaging test for diagnosing axSpA, in place of X-ray. MRI of the spine is added when there are symptoms in that region.
Data from the SPACE early-disease cohort, also presented at ACR Convergence 2026, show that sacroiliac joint MRI lesions are highly specific for early axSpA (95% or higher), with sensitivity of 36–51%. A positive MRI is therefore strong evidence, but a negative MRI does not fully exclude the diagnosis.
| Test | Role | Key points |
|---|---|---|
| MRI sacroiliac joints | First imaging test (EULAR 2025 update) | STIR and T1 sequences. Detects active inflammation before structural change appears on X-ray. Gadolinium adds little. |
| MRI spine | Added when there are spinal symptoms | Can also help with the differential diagnosis. |
| X-ray pelvis or sacroiliac joints | Previously first-line. Now an alternative when MRI is unavailable or contraindicated | Definite sacroiliitis (bilateral grade 2 or higher, or unilateral grade 3–4) meets the modified New York criteria. Changes can take years to appear and readers often disagree. |
| X-ray spine | Not part of the diagnostic work-up | Not recommended for diagnosis. |
What Counts as a Positive MRI
- Subchondral bone marrow oedema: two or more lesions on one slice, or one lesion on two or more consecutive slices.
- Erosions and fatty lesions on T1 sequences add sensitivity.
MRI Pitfalls
Mild bone marrow oedema at the sacroiliac joints is also seen in postpartum women, athletes and degenerative disease. The scan must be read in clinical context.
“A normal X-ray was never good evidence against early disease, because the changes take years to show. Going straight to MRI of the sacroiliac joints gives a patient with a convincing story a much better chance of an early answer.”
Dr Murli Krishna, Consultant in Pain Medicine, Pain Spa
Diagnostic Pathway
The ASAS-modified Berlin algorithm combines imaging, the number of SpA features, HLA-B27 and MRI. It is shown below as published, with X-ray as the opening step.
Step 1: X-ray of the sacroiliac joints
Definite sacroiliitis by modified New York criteria?
YES → Ankylosing spondylitis
NO → go to Step 2
The 11 features that count
- Inflammatory back pain
- Alternating buttock pain
- Heel pain (enthesitis)
- Asymmetric arthritis
- Dactylitis
- Anterior uveitis (iritis)
- Psoriasis
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Good response to NSAIDs
- Family history of axSpA, reactive arthritis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease or anterior uveitis
- Raised CRP or ESR
4 or more features
→ Non-radiographic axSpA
2 to 3 features: check HLA-B27
POSITIVE → Non-radiographic axSpA
NEGATIVE → MRI of the sacroiliac joints
Sacroiliitis on MRI → Non-radiographic axSpA
No sacroiliitis → consider another diagnosis
0 to 1 features: check HLA-B27
NEGATIVE → consider another diagnosis
POSITIVE → MRI of the sacroiliac joints
Sacroiliitis on MRI → Non-radiographic axSpA
No sacroiliitis → consider another diagnosis
Adapted from the ASAS modification of the Berlin diagnostic algorithm, as shown in Mease P, Deodhar A. Differentiating nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis from its mimics: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022. SpA features are listed in the table under “Who to Evaluate”.
ASAS Classification Criteria
| Entry criterion: back pain for 3 months or more, onset before age 45 | |
|---|---|
| Imaging arm Sacroiliitis on imaging plus at least 1 SpA feature |
Clinical arm HLA-B27 positive plus at least 2 other SpA features |
The ASAS and modified New York criteria are classification tools designed for research. They help to organise the findings but do not replace clinical diagnosis. Revised ASAS criteria were presented in 2026 and place greater weight on MRI.
Mimics and Red Flags
| Condition | Distinguishing points |
|---|---|
| Mechanical or degenerative spine disease | The most common mimic |
| Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) | Older patients; flowing anterior ossification; sacroiliac joints spared |
| Osteitis condensans ilii | Sclerosis on the iliac side; often in women after childbirth |
| Fibromyalgia or chronic widespread pain | Widespread pain without objective inflammation |
| Infection | Unilateral sacroiliitis with fever or systemic signs (septic sacroiliitis, brucellosis, tuberculosis) |
| Malignancy | History of cancer; weight loss |
Red flags for serious spinal pathology
These call for prompt evaluation or imaging, not a routine inflammatory back pain work-up:
- Progressive motor or sensory deficit
- Bowel or bladder dysfunction
- Fever or unexplained weight loss
- History of cancer
- Recent or current infection
- Significant trauma
- Prolonged corticosteroid use
In a patient with established disease and new spinal pain, stay alert to an unstable vertebral fracture and immobilise properly before imaging.
Referral
- Refer to rheumatology early to confirm the diagnosis and lead treatment. Diagnosis is often delayed by years.
- Consider referral for any adolescent or young adult with unexplained back pain lasting more than 3 months.
- An NSAID trial can begin while awaiting referral. A good response within 24–48 hours of a full dose counts as an SpA feature.
“Our role is to recognise the pattern, arrange the right tests and involve a rheumatologist early. Pain management still has a place afterwards, but it works best alongside treatment of the underlying disease.”
Dr Murli Krishna, Consultant in Pain Medicine, Pain Spa
For Patients: Could My Back Pain Be Ankylosing Spondylitis?
Most back pain is mechanical, meaning it comes from the joints, discs and muscles and is not caused by inflammation. A small number of people have an inflammatory condition called ankylosing spondylitis, which affects the joints at the base of the spine and the spine itself. It usually starts in the teens, twenties or thirties.
Signs that are worth mentioning to your doctor
- Back pain that has lasted more than three months and started before you were 45
- Pain and stiffness that are worse in the morning or after resting, and ease when you move
- Pain that wakes you in the second half of the night
- Buttock pain that swaps from side to side
- Pain that improves a lot with anti-inflammatory tablets
- A history of psoriasis, bowel inflammation, a painful red eye, heel pain or a swollen finger or toe
- A close relative with a similar condition
What tests might I have?
- Blood tests. These look for inflammation and for a gene called HLA-B27. They are helpful but cannot give the answer alone. Blood tests are often normal even when the condition is present, and many people carry the gene without ever becoming unwell.
- An MRI scan. This is now the preferred first scan because it can show inflammation early, before anything is visible on an X-ray.
- A specialist opinion. The diagnosis is made by a rheumatologist, who puts your symptoms, examination, blood tests and scan together.
Why does early diagnosis matter?
Many people wait years for the right diagnosis. Finding it sooner means the right treatment can start sooner.
Seek urgent medical help if you have a painful red eye with sensitivity to light, new weakness or numbness, loss of bladder or bowel control, or fever with back pain.
References
- Bittar M, Deodhar A. Axial spondyloarthritis: a review. JAMA. 2025.
- Navarro-Compán V, Sepriano A, Capelusnik D, Baraliakos X. Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet. 2025.
- Robinson PC, van der Linden S, Khan MA, Taylor WJ. Axial spondyloarthritis: concept, construct, classification and implications for therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021.
- De Craemer AS, Łukasik Z, Carron P. Use of imaging in axial spondyloarthritis for diagnosis and assessment of disease remission in the year 2022. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2022.
- Taurog JD, Chhabra A, Colbert RA. Ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2016.
- Toussirot É. Diagnosis and management of late-onset spondyloarthritis. Drugs Aging. 2015.
- Mease P, Deodhar A. Differentiating nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis from its mimics: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022.
- Mandl P, Watschinger C, Pedersen S, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice: 2025 update. ACR Convergence 2026 Abstracts. 2026.
- Bento da Silva A, van Gaalen F, van Lunteren M, et al. Performance of sacroiliac joint and spinal MRI lesions in early axial spondyloarthritis: data from the SPACE cohort. ACR Convergence 2026 Abstracts. 2026.
- Ankylosing spondylitis. Clinical Overview. Elsevier ClinicalKey. Updated September 2026.
- Inman RD, Rahman P. Spondyloarthritis. In: Goldman-Cecil Medicine.
- Weiss PF. Ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthritides. In: Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics.
This article is for education and does not replace individual clinical assessment.